Canadian Lawyer InHouse

Oct/Nov 2010

Legal news and trends for Canadian in-house counsel and c-suite executives

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/50884

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 2 of 47

EDITOR'S BOX By Andi Balla INHOUSE Group Publisher: Karen Lorimer Editorial Director: Gail J. Cohen Editor: Andi Balla Staff Writer: Robert Todd Copy Editor: Heather Gardiner Art Director: Bill Hunter Account Co-ordinator: Catherine Giles Advertising Sales Representatives Legal Suppliers: Kimberlee Pascoe Tel: (905) 713-4342 E-mail: kpascoe@clbmedia.ca Law Firms: Karen Lorimer Tel: (905) 713-4339 E-mail: klorimer@clbmedia.ca Kathy Liotta Tel: (905) 713-4340 E-mail: kliotta@clbmedia.ca Sales Co-ordinator: Sandy Shutt Tel: (905) 713-4337 E-mail: sshutt@clbmedia.ca Canadian Lawyer InHouse is published 6 times a year by Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd., 240 Edward St., Aurora, Ont. L4G 3S9 (905) 841-6480 Fax: (905) 727-0017. E-mail: cleditor@clbmedia.ca Web: www.canadianlawyermag.com/inhouse All rights reserved. Contents may not be reprinted without written permission. The opinions expressed in articles are not necessarily those of the publisher. Information presented is compiled from sources believed to be accurate, however, the publisher assumes no responsi- bility for errors or omissions. Canadian Lawyer InHouse disclaims any warranty as to the accuracy, completeness or currency of the contents of this publication and disclaims all liability in respect of the results of any action taken or not taken in reliance upon information in this publication. Publications Mail Agreement #40766500 ISSN 1921-9563 Copyright © 2010 H.S.T. Registration #R121349799 To subscribe Call 1-888-743-3551 x4392 or e-mail Jacquie Clancy at jclancy@clbmedia.ca RETURN UNDELIVERABLE CANADIAN ADDRESS TO: CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT 240 EDWARD ST., AURORA, ON L4G 3S9 Indexed in the Canadian Periodical Index Indexed in the Canadian Periodical Index www.canadianlawyermag.com/inhouse One country, one regulator quartered to whether Ottawa even has a constitutional right to take over regulat- ing securities from the provinces. Each party involved in this debate has its own priorities. The provinces are trying to protect what they see as their rights, local jobs, and income streams. The federal government wants a more streamlined process. And both sides say they want to protect the interests of the business com- munity and the public at large. The fact is Canada is the only country T in the Western world to offer a geog- raphy-based patchwork of regulators. Regionalism might have worked in the past, but it doesn't stand up well to new realities in a global economy. When com- panies want to raise money in different provinces they want to be ruled by one book, not 13 written by different prov- inces and territories. And most public companies would welcome the simpler approach to securities law provided by a single regulator. This is one country. It is high time for it to have a single securities regulator. And if things go according to the federal government's plan, it will. The proposed Canadian securities act, which the federal government released in May, is mostly based on the provinces' own regulations, and the federal government was very careful in the wording to make sure the act would stand up to constitu- tional challenges in court. Those chal- lenges come from Alberta and Quebec, which strongly oppose the idea of a he discussion on everything relat- ed to Canada's proposed national securities regulator has heated up — from where it should be head- federal regulator. But other provinces are likely to join in any constitutional discus- sions since they too want to protect their interests. The federal government also seems willing to keep a lot of the same provin- cial regulatory structures in place as long as they work under a unified system, which makes the debate about where the headquarters of the new national regula- tor would be based less relevant. At the end of the day, everyone — whether businesses, the federal govern- ment, or the provinces — is "Looking for certainty," as our cover story by Helen Burnett-Nichols points out on page 18, and that should be the top priority as the national regulator is established over the next couple of years. But that is not the only heated debate covered in this issue. In "Finding the right approach," on page 26, Robert Todd reports on the battle to streamline regulations and practices on drug and alcohol testing in the workplace. In closing, I'd like to add a few words about the economy, which has lost some of its steam over the past couple of months. That's the case particularly in the United States, where growth fore- casts have been slashed. A sluggish recovery and persistent high unemploy- ment south of the border do not bode well for Canada either, as the two econo- mies are strongly linked. Only time will tell how a bad U.S. economy will affect Canada in the long term. But we will deal more in length with this topic in the next edition of InHouse, which deals with cross-border issues. IH Send your news and story ideas to aballa@clbmedia.ca INHOUSE OCTOBER 2010 • 3

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer InHouse - Oct/Nov 2010