Canadian Lawyer

March 2009

The most widely read magazine for Canadian lawyers

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/50802

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 18 of 51

REAL ESTATE 'I can't pay you. Can we make a deal? If you want to go ahead and sue me, go ahead.'" — HARVEY HABER, GOLDMAN SLOAN NASH & HABER LLP deal with problems that seldom surfaced during the boom years of real estate. This look at commercial leasing today examines the tensions lawyers are grap- pling with in Ontario's highly stressed commercial leasing market, as well as a timely move to update the 19th century legislation governing commercial leas- ing in British Columbia. Ontario: Landlords and tenants pulling on the lease As an expert in commercial leasing and mediation, Harvey Haber now has an opportunity to exercise all his skills. As he and other real estate lawyers point out, today's depressed market condi- tions are compelling many landlords and tenants to come up with new deals or compromises that will allow both to stay in business. "Once tenants realize they've got a problem, they should take their financial statements and meet with their landlords. They should say, 'My problem is really your problem because if I go out of business you'll be out your money,'" says Haber, a partner at Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP in Toronto. "There's nothing wrong with saying to the landlord, 'I can't pay you. Can we make a deal? If you want to go ahead and sue me, go ahead.'" Tenants may well be surprised at how willing a landlord will be to nego- tiate, says Susan Rosen, a partner in the Toronto office of Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP. She notes that landlords are not only anxious to keep their cash flow going, but are also concerned about the impact on other tenants if neigh- bouring businesses close shop. And, in today's market, she adds, "there may not be other people knocking on the land- lord's door to take the space." So what kinds of deals are tenants striking up with their landlords? Robyn Kestenberg, a partner at Minden Gross really a cost-benefit analysis," he says. In these circumstances, he adds, "the quickest, cheapest, best option" is for the tenants to figure out what the dam- ages would likely be if they were sued for defaulting on the lease and cut the landlord a cheque for that amount. Grignano also warns clients about LLP in Toronto, says she is seeing deals involving rent abatement and rent defer- rals. She says some landlords are also making new arrangements concerning the security that they are requiring from tenants, allowing tenants to use trade fixtures, for example, to secure addi- tional loan financing, even though this had originally been prohibited under the terms of the lease. "It's important for lawyers to recog- nize the business realities and be prac- tical, rather than looking at the terms of the lease alone. The lease may give you legal rights, but, at the end of the day, it doesn't necessarily give you the result your client is looking for," says Kestenberg. Rosen says some landlords and retail tenants are now making deals involving percentage rents. This hitherto seldom- used arrangement involves reducing rents so they cover the landlord's basic costs with a proviso that the tenant will pay a percentage of sales as business picks up again. Joseph Grignano, a consultant in the Toronto office of Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP, observes that sometimes tenants may do the math and come to the conclusion that they just can't honour the terms of their lease. "I don't want to be advocating defaults, but it's the risk of "midnight moves." He says trying to remove your inventory and other property from the building so your landlord can't seize it is obviously illegal and could result in significant lia- bilities, not only for the tenant, but also for anyone who helps with the move. While market conditions are forcing everyone to negotiate as much as pos- sible, there are limits and there are situa- tions where landlords would rather take the risk of looking for a new tenant than make a deal, says Kestenberg, noting that a frustrated landlord will sometimes tell her, "I'd rather have the space than have to deal with this guy anymore." British Columbia: A new lease on life for a moribund law Commercial landlords or tenants in British Columbia who want to under- stand their rights and obligations will sometimes make the mistake of consult- ing the province's Commercial Tenancy Act. But they soon realize they'll need a lawyer to interpret this 112-year-old statute with its 200-word sentences and arcane references to obsolete terms such as "rentseck" or "rent of assize." Unfortunately, the odds are that the lawyer won't understand it either. "It's like The Da Vinci Code of B.C. statues," says commercial leasing spe- cialist Scott Smythe, a partner in the Vancouver office of McCarthy Tétrault LLP. He notes that the law still incorpor- ates language and English legal concepts derived from feudal times. "It's extremely antiquated and frankly impenetrable www. C ANADIAN Law ye rmag.com M ARCH 2009 19 "There's nothing wrong with saying to the landlord,

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer - March 2009