The most widely read magazine for Canadian lawyers
Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/1544922
4 www.canadianlawyermag.com UPFRONT NEWS ANALYSIS ON A grey Vancouver morning last October, lawyers clad in black packed a downtown Vancouver courtroom waiting for the arrival of BC Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald Skolrood. Representing the Crown, the Law Society of BC, the Trial Lawyers Association of BC, and a slew of intervenors, the lawyers were preparing to make their case in a weeks-long trial for or against legislation that, if not successfully challenged, will fundamentally change how lawyers are regulated in the province. The legislation in question, the Legal Professions Act, received royal assent in 2024. For decades, the LSBC had been tasked with regulating lawyers across the province. The new law proposes a more streamlined approach: getting rid of the LSBC and establishing a new legal regulator that will oversee not only lawyers but also paralegals and notaries. Notably, the proposed regulator will feature a new governance structure. The LSBC is currently overseen by a board of 25 lawyers and up to six non-lawyers; other lawyers across the province elect the lawyer members. In contrast, the new regulator will be governed by a 17-person board, of which nine members will be lawyers. Only five of those nine lawyers will be elected by lawyers across BC, meaning lawyer-elected lawyers will no longer hold a majority. The remaining board members will be selected by notaries, paralegals, the lieutenant governor in council, and other board members. The LSBC and the Trial Lawyers Association of BC both filed constitutional challenges to the Legal Professions Act in court shortly after the law passed. But on April 29, Skolrood dismissed the challenges, ruling that the legislation neither improperly undermines the indepen- dence of the bar nor violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The chief justice added that the BC legislature has the authority to enact the law, paving the way for it to be implemented. The same afternoon the court released Skolrood's decision, the Trial Lawyers Association of BC indicated it would likely file an appeal. The LSBC said it was also considering appealing the ruling. Both orga- nizations said that in spite of Skolrood's find- ings, their stance remains the same: the bar must be independent, and lawyers must be able to serve their clients without the spectre of government interference. On that first day of trial in October, Lawson Lundell LLP partner Craig Ferris, representing the LSBC, had told Skolrood that the law society had no issue with the concept of a single legal regulator for lawyers, paralegals, and notaries. What the law society disagreed with was the notion of a new governance structure that effectively gives lawyer-elected lawyers less power than they currently hold at the LSBC. "An independent bar can only be preserved by structures that ensure appropriate distance from the state," Ferris said. LSBC fights for self-regulation The Law Society of BC and the Trial Lawyers Association of BC are challenging a BC law slated to give elected lawyers less say in how the bar is regulated, writes Jessica Mach. Will they succeed? "An independent bar can only be preserved by structures that ensure appropriate distance from the state. Without self-governance and self-regulation, there is an institutional opening of the door to government control and interference" Craig Ferris, Lawson Lundell LLP (representing the Law Society of British Columbia)