Canadian Lawyer

May 2018

The most widely read magazine for Canadian lawyers

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/977574

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 52 of 55

w w w . C A N A D I A N L a w y e r m a g . c o m M A Y 2 0 1 8 53 He says another factor that works against Canada's pursuit of bribery and white collar crime in general is the time it takes cases to get from the charge to the sentencing stage. "Criminal trials in Canada are more cumbersome and the criminal process in Canada is more cumbersome and time- consuming than it is in the United States," he says. "The result is Canada's record in white collar prosecutions, at least at the trial level relative to the United States, is abysmal." In 2008, former chief justice of the Superior Court Patrick LeSage and Uni- versity of Toronto Law Professor Michael Code authored a "Report of the Review of Large and Complex Criminal Case Proce- dures" to respond and offer recommen- dations to increasingly time-consuming complex criminal trials. LeSage and Code wrote that three fac- tors had transformed the trial process from succinct in the seventies to the present marathon. "These three causal events were the pas- sage of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the reform of evidence law by the Supreme Court of Canada, and the addition of many new complex statutory provisions to the Criminal Code and other related statutes," they wrote in the report. "All the criticism that they make of criminal processing in Canada for large complex trials are multiplied exponentially in a white-collar case, which includes cor- ruption cases because you have an extra element of forensic accounting evidence, which creates even more complexity," says Barutciski. Another factor in Canada is that, to convict the company in Canada, the brib- ery offence must be proven to have been committed, beyond a reasonable doubt, "with the knowledge or acquiescence or under the direction of the senior officer," he says. In the U.S., if authorities can show that a lower-level employee authorized a bribe, the knowledge does not have to reach the upper echelons for the company to be liable. "So that's another reason why U.S. com- panies, they are more exposed. They can be convicted on the basis of the guilty actions of a fairly junior employee," Barutciski says. Pursuing bribery allegations with the criminal law alone is "too blunt an instru- ment," says Joseph Groia, principal of Groia and Company. What is lacking in anti-bribery is a national financial regulator such as the Securities and Exchange Commission in the U.S., Canada having provincial agencies regulating their respective capital markets, says Groia, who is a securities litigator and has acted in civil, criminal and administra- tive cases including the Bre-X and Hol- linger affairs. "If you had a national enforcement agency and a national regulator who could go after public companies on a national and international basis, then there's a whole range of administrative and civil powers that would be available," he says. With a national securities regulator, Canada could work on a national basis together with the SEC, giving Canada an enhanced status in pursuing corruption, he says. Visit gpllm.law.utoronto.ca Questions? gpllm@utoronto.ca Apply today. ONE YEAR | PART-TIME | FOR LAWYERS AND BUSINESS LEADERS Master the Law. Canada's leading law school offers a graduate degree in four unique streams: Business Law Canadian Law in a Global Context Innovation, Law and Technology Law of Leadership ntitled-6 1 2017-07-12 1:19 PM

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer - May 2018