Canadian Lawyer

February 2018

The most widely read magazine for Canadian lawyers

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/934071

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 2 of 51

w w w . C A N A D I A N L a w y e r m a g . c o m F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 8 3 re law schools training tomorrow's or yesterday's lawyers? It is an urgent question, yet there is no simple answer. As our cover story outlines (p. 28), there are critics who say unequiv- ocally that law schools are falling behind the times to the detriment of graduates. Darrel Pink, former head of the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society, put it bluntly when he said the Canadian academy is "con- tinuing to do a very good job of training yesterday's lawyers." Pink, who was one of Canadian Lawyer's Top 25 Most Influ- ential Lawyers in 2017 due to his work on regulatory innovation, is no traditionalist. He, along with other critics such as Jason Moyse and Mitch Kowalski, think Canada's law schools are nowhere close to where they need to be. But Pink, Moyse and Kowalski are innovators who want to push boundaries. Are the law schools intentionally not innovating simply because they are resistant to change? To find out, our writer spoke with law deans across Canada. What he heard was not resistance so much as exasperation. Law deans know law schools need to change and innovate, but they aren't able to do so at the pace they want. They face a number of barriers. For Ian Holloway, dean at the University of Calgary's law school, it is data. Law schools don't know what is working and what isn't because they aren't tracking it. "We're working on it," he told us. Lorne Sossin, outgoing dean at Osgoode Hall, says innovation is often discom- forting. He also cites "limited time, resources and knowledge" as hurdles. Paul Paton at the University of Alberta mentions "entrenched interests" as a barrier. For Erika Chamberlain, dean of law at Western University, it is a "sense of inertia." But it was comments from my alma mater, the University of Toronto, that really struck me as highlighting the nub of the problem. Dean Ed Iacobucci asked, "Who knows if the software you use today will be the software you use tomor- row?" Teaching lawyers to use technology, a key skill for tomorrow's lawyers, is just teaching them something that will soon be out of date. Iacobucci seemed exasperated by the rate of change, suggesting that trying to keep up with every new tool was a fool's errand. In other words, law schools should teach you to "think like a lawyer." The rest you can figure out on the job. But will lawyers in the new economy even need to think the same way as they have in the past? As Moyse points out, lawyers are increasingly going to be needed to "build information products comprised of a mix of tech, design [and] project management." They won't so much be using technology as building it. Will this still require them to "think like a lawyer"? Or will their legal training be for yesterday's jobs, leaving them ill equipped to build the new products, as Moyse predicts? For tomorrow's lawyers, the answer is vital. And law schools need to figure out the answer today. E D I T O R ' S D E S K @canlawmag tim.wilbur@tr.com Director/Group Publisher: Karen Lorimer karen.lorimer@tr.com Managing Editor: Tim Wilbur tim.wilbur@tr.com Acting Associate Editor: Aidan Macnab aidan.macnab@tr.com Copy Editor: Patricia Cancilla Art Director: Bill Hunter Production Co-ordinator: Catherine Giles catherine.giles@tr.com Contributors: Scott Neilson, donalee Moulton, Mark Cardwell, Geoff Ellwand, Jean Sorensen, Marg. Bruineman, Jennifer Brown, Mallory Hendry, Jim Middlemiss, Elizabeth Raymer, Alex Robinson Canadian Lawyer is published 11 times a year by Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents may not be reprinted without written permission. The opinions expressed in articles are not necessarily those of the publisher. Information presented is compiled from sources believed to be accurate, however, the publisher assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. Canadian Lawyer disclaims any warranty as to the accuracy, completeness or currency of the contents of this publication and disclaims all liability in respect of the results of any action taken or not taken in reliance upon information in this publication. Sales and Business Development Sales Manager: Paul Burton E-mail: paul.burton@tr.com Tel: 416-649-9928 Business Development Consultant: Ivan Ivanovitch E-mail: ivan.ivanovitch@tr.com Tel: 416-887-4300 Business Development Consultant: Kimberlee Pascoe E-mail: kimberlee.pascoe@tr.com Tel: 416-996-1739 Account Executive: Steffanie Munroe E-mail: steffanie.munroe@tr.com Tel: 416-315-5879 Canadian Lawyer Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Tel: (416) 298-5141 Fax: (416) 649-7870 E-mail: cl.editor@tr.com Web: canadianlawyermag.com Linkedin: linkedin.com/groups/4917423 Twitter: @canlawmag Facebook: facebook.com/CanLawMag Publications Mail Agreement #40766500 ISSN 0703-2129 © 2018 HST Registration #R121349799 RETURN UNDELIVERABLE CANADIAN ADDRESS TO: CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT One Corporate Plaza 2075 Kennedy RD., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 RETOURNER TOUTE CORRESPONDANCE NE POUVANT ÊTRE LIVRÉE AU CANADA AU SERVICE DES PUBLICATIONS One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Circulation/Address Changes/ Subscriptions Keith Fulford Tel: (416) 649-9585 Fax: (416) 649-7870 E-mail: keith.fulford@tr.com Subscription rates: Canada1 year print and digital $102 plus HST, 1 year digital only $99. Outside Canada 1 year print & digital $99 USD, 1 year digital only $99. For all circulation inquiries and address changes send a copy of your mailing label or labels along with your request in writing to Canadian Lawyer, One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Training tomorrow's lawyers By Tim Wilbur A

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer - February 2018