Canadian Lawyer InHouse

July 2017

Legal news and trends for Canadian in-house counsel and c-suite executives

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/841015

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 34 of 43

35 CANADIANLAWYERMAG.COM/INHOUSE JULY 2017 "Some breaches in the U.S. brought at- tention to the fact law firms can be a target, and in this day and age any law firm can be a target," says Wasser. "I have read a lot of articles that say law firms are the weak link and I think that was probably true in the past, but I do think, especially with the breaches that happened last year, that law firms are very quickly coming up to speed." Lawyers and law firms have always had a duty in terms of confidentiality with client information, but companies are becoming more sophisticated in knowing they need to build contractual protections into their agreements with their service providers and that includes their outside law firms. "I think when talking about service pro - viders there is a two-step approach — con- tractual protection, which can help you in the event of a breach, and allocating li- ability, but also nobody wants to have that breach to start with. I think the first step is to do some due diligence and ask questions to make sure a service provider is taking the steps necessary to secure information the best they can." The problem, too, says Wasser, is that in many instances breaches are not being per - petrated by the people you are entrusting the information to — many are as a result of outside intrusions and cyberattacks. "I think a lot of organizations are asking their service providers including their law firms what are your processes and getting the information they need about whether further steps need to be taken to protect the information before they get to the contract stage," she says. This spring, the Association of Corporate Counsel issued guidelines for law firm cyber - security. The push for guidelines has been driven largely by one of the most regulated sectors law firms deal with, says Amar Sarwal, ACC vice president and chief legal strategist. "It's been driven largely by the financial services industry, particularly the banks as they have been getting pressure for a number of years from the regulators who are pushing them to closely monitor and audit their entire supply chain," says Sar - wal. "There was definitely a push by the big banks, but the goal of the ACC is to give guidance to in-house departments writ large, not just one particular industry." The ACC's safety guideline for outside counsel who have access to sensitive company data as part of their engagements with corporate law departments is called "Model Information Protection and Security Controls for Outside Counsel Possessing Company Confidential Information" and serves as a benchmark for law firm cybersecurity practices. Encompassing information retention/ return/destruction, data handling and en - cryption, data breach reporting, physical security, employee background screening and cyber-liability insurance, the model requirements are based on ACC members' experience, past data security audits and learned best practices in ensuring that sen - sitive client data remains confidential. "We are increasingly hearing from ACC members, at companies of all sizes, that cy- bersecurity is one of their chief concerns, and there is heightened risk involved when shar- ing sensitive data with your outside counsel," says Sarwal. "With these Model Information Protection and Security Controls, the in- house bar, with the help of outside counsel, is taking the lead on sharing established best practices to promote data security." A number of ACC members worked together to draft the guidelines, receiving input from several law firms on the stan - dards. The guidelines are being issued on the heels of the "ACC Chief Legal Officers (CLO) 2017 Survey" finding that informa- tion privacy and data breaches/protection of corporate data were ranked as "very" or "extremely" important by two-thirds of CLOs and general counsel. Since 2014, the percentage of GCs and CLOs expressing data breaches as "extremely" important rose to 26 per cent this year from 19 per cent. "The trust between a law firm and a cli - ent is fundamental to a productive attor- ney-client relationship. A vital way for law firms to gain client trust is to protect the confidential information provided to them by their clients from cyber-threats," said Brennan Torregrossa, vice president, asso - ciate general counsel and head of the global external legal relations team at GlaxoS- mithKline, whose law department assisted in developing the guidelines. "These model controls should be extremely valuable to ACC legal departments and law firms alike to ensure that adequate tools and processes are in place to provide cyber-protection and to take agreed-upon steps in the event of a breach. In a time of rapidly developing risks and threats, clients and law firms need to respond in unison with speed and clarity." Many corporate law departments conduct data security audits when they retain a new law firm, a responsibility increasingly held by corporate legal operations professionals that manage outside counsel relationships. According to the "ACC Foundation: The State of Cybersecurity Report," more than one quarter of in-house counsel are "not confident" or "not sure" regarding their law firms' data security. The ACC guidelines will give companies a benchmark when cre - ating their own requirements for outside counsel or when initiating a security audit. Sarwal says large law firms have done a better job nailing down protocols because they have been under pressure from their cli - ents for some time now to address the issue. He thinks the largest firms in Canada have been more proactive on a wide array of issues. "They aren't perfect and there's more work to be done, but they've been more collaborative," he says. The mid-size firms on both sides of the border are the intended targets of the ACC's model. In the context of law firm mergers, Sarwal says that, in some cases, the in-house coun - sel have taken a hard look at the merged firm and wondered do they have the same information security protocols that they agreed to with the acquirer firm? "It does require some ingenuity on the part of in-house counsel and the outside L a w D e p a r t m e n t M a n a g e m e n t We are increasingly hearing from ACC members, at companies of all sizes, that cybersecurity is one of their chief concerns, and there is heightened risk involved when sharing sensitive data with your outside counsel. AMAR SARWAL, ACC

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer InHouse - July 2017