Canadian Lawyer

w w w . C A N A D I A N L a w y e r m a g . c o m M A Y 2 0 1 7 3 E D I T O R ' S D E S K @canlawmag tim.wilbur@tr.com Director/Group Publisher: Karen Lorimer karen.lorimer@tr.com Managing Editor: Tim Wilbur tim.wilbur@tr.com Associate Editor: Mallory Hendry mallory.hendry@tr.com Copy Editor: Patricia Cancilla Art Director: Bill Hunter Production Co-ordinator: Catherine Giles catherine.giles@tr.com Contributors: Shannon Kari, donalee Moulton, Mark Cardwell, Alex Robinson, Geoff Ellwand, Jean Sorensen, Marg. Bruineman, Mallory Hendry, Jim Middlemiss, Jennifer Brown, Elizabeth Raymer Canadian Lawyer is published 11 times a year by Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents may not be reprinted without written permission. The opinions expressed in articles are not necessarily those of the publisher. Information presented is compiled from sources believed to be accurate, however, the publisher assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. Canadian Lawyer disclaims any warranty as to the accuracy, completeness or currency of the contents of this publication and disclaims all liability in respect of the results of any action taken or not taken in reliance upon information in this publication. Sales and Business Development Business Development Consultant: Ivan Ivanovitch E-mail: ivan.ivanovitch@tr.com Tel: 416-887-4300 Client Development Manager: Grace So E-mail: grace.so@tr.com Tel: 416-903-4473 Business Development Consultant: Kimberlee Pascoe E-mail: kimberlee.pascoe@tr.com Tel: 416-996-1739 Account Executive: Steffanie Munroe E-mail: steffanie.munroe@tr.com Tel: 416-315-5879 Canadian Lawyer Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Tel: (416) 298-5141 Fax: (416) 649-7870 E-mail: cl.editor@tr.com Web: canadianlawyermag.com Linkedin: linkedin.com/groups/4917423 Twitter: @canlawmag Facebook: facebook.com/CanLawMag Publications Mail Agreement #40766500 ISSN 0703-2129 © 2017 HST Registration #R121349799 RETURN UNDELIVERABLE CANADIAN ADDRESS TO: CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT One Corporate Plaza 2075 Kennedy RD., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 RETOURNER TOUTE CORRESPONDANCE NE POUVANT ÊTRE LIVRÉE AU CANADA AU SERVICE DES PUBLICATIONS One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Circulation/Address Changes/ Subscriptions Keith Fulford Tel: (416) 649-9585 Fax: (416) 649-7870 E-mail: keith.fulford@tr.com Subscription rates: Canada1 year print and digital $102 plus HST, 1 year digital only $99. Outside Canada 1 year print & digital $99 USD, 1 year digital only $99. For all circulation inquiries and address changes send a copy of your mailing label or labels along with your request in writing to Canadian Lawyer, One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 id the Supreme Court of Canada help anything when it released R. v. Jordan last July, giving courts a timeline before criminal charges are stayed due to delay? Regardless of how you answer that question, you can't deny that the decision has had an effect. The SCC essen- tially launched a grenade into the debate about trial delays and how to fix them. There are a number of critics of the decision who think the court overstepped its bounds. These include some in the media who have accused the court of letting criminals off "scot-free" and threatening "legal anarchy." The dissenting SCC judges put it more mildly, saying it is Parliament's job to make those kinds of rules. These critics see it as the gov- ernment's job, not the courts, to deal with how the system is — or isn't — funded. But the problem with this argument is that without a grenade, the government will likely never act. As lawyers all know, pumping money into our justice system doesn't buy votes. And as politicians all know, spending money on education and health care often does. People understand that the sick need to be cared for and children need to learn. Voters don't sympathize so much when you throw money at "criminals." That is why Jordan, instead of overstepping any bounds, was actually a gift to politicians who privately acknowledge that fixing trial delays should be a political priority. Provincial governments can now tell their voters that they are working with Ottawa to prevent murderers from walking the streets. Like any complex problem, however, there are entrenched interests and wide-ranging views on just how to fix the problem. And as our cover story (p. 24) explores, solutions are starting to bubble up across Canada. Some ideas are not so good, such as eliminating preliminary inquiries that often speed up, not slow down, the resolution of cases. But other ideas — such as Alberta's "triage protocol" for Crown Counsel or B.C.'s use of pre-charge screening by the prosecution and administrative penalties for impaired driving cases — may be working. As many less dramatic commentators have pointed out, the fear that a flood of people facing serious criminal charges are going to be released may be misplaced. The real meat of the problem is not the high-profile murder cases where someone could potentially be "let off." It is the mid-level offences, such as theft, impaired driving and failing to comply with a court order. Solving the bottlenecks for these offences may not be as politically urgent — theft charges being stayed does not make as dramatic a headline as murder charges being dropped — but expediting these cases is where the real reform is needed. But Jordan again may help, if gov- ernments can argue that "diversion" programs are more necessary so that scarce criminal justice resources can be redirected to the more serious cases. Certainly, Jordan didn't solve the problem of court delays. The Supreme Court can't do that. But it launched a grenade, which will always cause people in the room to focus their attention and speed things up. The solution to court delays By Tim Wilbur D

• Cover