Canadian Lawyer

March 2017

The most widely read magazine for Canadian lawyers

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/790278

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 20 of 51

w w w . C A N A D I A N L a w y e r m a g . c o m M A R C H 2 0 1 7 21 eral counsel use when meeting with the firms. The idea is to constantly streamline and improve the process. Cordo says Shell is getting to the point where it will generate reports about what worked and what didn't, which is then shared with the firms for a more transparent process. Pricing consultant Nancey Watson says there's a bit of urgency for firms to earn a spot on the preferred panel list for compa- nies because if they don't, they'll be out of the running altogether until the company decides it's time to create new rosters of law firms. And it's not always large firms they're looking for; boutique and regional firms are often sought out for the work. She is also seeing monitoring of legal services taking a firm hold in the legal services procurement process. Compa- nies are tracking invoices, the budgeting process, the success rate of lawyers and firms and how much money they're saving the company. "The companies now have such sophisticated software that they can drill down to individual lawyers, let alone law firms. So everything they do is being tracked. And all companies have KPIs — key performance indicators." Some, she says, have up to 100 KPIs they track with firms and, like Shell, they may share many of these with the firms. Watson says it's become important for the firms to track their own performance to find areas they can improve upon. Gowling WLG LLP's pricing strategy manager Andreea Axani says in addition to putting together teams of both lawyers and supports such as pricing and project managers to respond to RFPs, her firm has developed internal methodologies and pro- cesses. And, like the companies, Gowlings collects information to measure its own performance to improve its approach. "We've noticed not only an increase in the number of formal requests but we've noticed a huge increase in complexity," says Axani. They are no longer necessarily restricted to one issue but can be a multi- channel, multi-phased approach in differ- ent service areas in different locations. Two years ago, the firm launched Gowl- ings Practical, its approach to legal project management using a collaborative software program that it says provides clients with cost certainty, efficiency and value. That helps to create good answers to the RFP and has led the firm to create templates for dif- ferent types of matters based on best prac- tices, says Rick Kathuria, director of PMO and legal logistics for Gowlings. "We can build up our plans and our pricing based on those templates and based on the historical data," he says. There is, in fact, a changing demand as companies become more strategic in their requests for legal services. They're looking for new and efficient approaches to the work, says UK-based James Wilson, direc- tor of global proposals, Baker & McKenzie Global Services LLC. "What clients are looking for is very different now from what it was even two, three years ago, and it's not just about an extra discount on the hourly rate. It's about more innovation and it's about more efficiency, it's about changing the way we work," says Wilson. There are also more partnerships between the client and the firm once the firm makes it on to the panel. Because the company has fewer firms to deal with, there is an increased desire for more interaction between the two, says Wilson. With this greater emphasis on partnerships, firms may become involved in providing insights and ideas about how to help manage the in-house team, help "look 'round corners to spot risk" and ideas to help increase effi- ciencies in managing the business. While the panels or preferred counsel lists are an important starting point in managing legal costs and compliance, the consolidation of firms helps company offi- cials get a little more up close and personal with the firms with which they are working. "Firms have to be all things to all clients these days," says Richard Brzakala, director of external legal services for CIBC's legal department. "It used to be that procure- ment managed legal services, but now it's about managing relationships." Clients want to feel like they've had a great experience with the limited number of law firms that they've decided to work with and that they've got value from the relation- ship, says Brzakala. And technology has provided the client with tools to measure what they're getting out of that relationship, how the firms are managing with the bud- get, the details of the project, the successes and the timelines. Infrastructure Ontario spends about $10 million annually on outside legal spending, over and above its team of 42 lawyers. It draws from its list of pre-qualified firms for three areas: major projects such as high- ways, hospitals and bridges, real estate ser- vices and lending and financing. Its vendor of record listing includes firms that have responded to its request for qualification in several legal service subject areas. A firm can be on one or several of the subject lists. If the estimated cost is less than $25,000, Infrastructure Ontario can simply choose a firm from the list. A second-stage RFP is issued for work exceeding $25,000, drawing three to five firms from the pre-qualified list. Marni Dicker, executive vice presi- dent of Infrastructure Ontario, says pricing and technical expertise used to be weighed equally, but there's acknowledgement that the firms on the lists are pre-qualified, so there has been more emphasis placed recently on price considerations. "Value for money is crucially important to us, so we don't necessarily take the most qualified firm because the most qualified firm might also be exponentially the most expensive," says Dicker. Infrastructure Ontario will ask for a guaranteed maximum price, so there is a ceiling. But, she adds, the process is constantly being refined. The provincial government department is about to test another approach: choosing a firm without firming up the price until after the firm is chosen for its ability to do the work. "These law firms are interested in being repeat ser- vice providers and I've been convinced that I'm not going to get gauged but I'm going to actually get better pricing." Proposal strategy and pricing consultant Nancey Watson has identified these current trends as large companies seek out legal services: • The use of procurement specialists to draft more sophisticated RFPs and performance measurement; • Companies using RFPs to create panels or preferred counsel rosters to consolidate the number of law firms they use; • Alterative (or appropriate) fee arrangements and value billing and billing transparency. New trends in RFPs

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer - March 2017