Canadian Lawyer

w w w . C A N A D I A N L a w y e r m a g . c o m J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 7 9 \ AT L A N T I C \ C E N T R A L \ P R A I R I E S \ W E S T REGIONAL WRAP-UP W hile the Law Society of Upper Canada has adopt- ed recommendations to battle systemic racism in the legal profession, diversity advocates say the report is just the beginning of what needs to be done. After a marathon debate in December that saw benchers question whether the 13 recommendations should be adopted entirely as one package, Convocation approved the report in a 33-0 vote with three abstentions. Equity groups that were consulted on the report applauded the passage of the recommendations, which they have been advocating for years. But they said there is a lot of hard work left to do, starting with implementing the recommendations. "The report here is intended to create the framework of the house and now you've got to build the bricks," says Ranjan Agar- wal, president of the South Asian Bar Association of Toronto. At issue in the meeting were two motions, one of which would pass the 13 recommendations all together as one pack- age. The report was the culmination of four years of work by the Challenges Faced by Racialized Licensees Working Group. The recommendations included requiring firms of at least 10 licensees to implement a diversity policy, which would provide fair recruitment practices. They also require firms of that size and larger to complete a diversity self-assessment every two years and submit it to the law society. The other motion, introduced by Bencher Sidney Troister, was an attempt to discuss and vote on the 13 recommendations separately so benchers could pick and choose. "Putting them all together as a package means the nuances get overlooked in the whole," Troister told Convocation toward the beginning of what turned into a daylong discussion, origi- nally scheduled for 80 minutes. The motions provoked an emotional debate with many benchers sharing their own personal stories of racism they have encountered. The idea of voting on the motions on a piecemeal basis was unpopular among diversity associations, who have said the rec- ommendations did not go far enough, but they supported the report under the understanding the whole package would be approved together. "I think our advocacy would have been different if we had known that what was being recommended or what was being considered was voluntary," says Agarwal. A number of benchers took issue with a recommendation that requires every licensee to "adopt and abide by a statement of principles acknowledging their obligation to promote equity," saying having such a requirement would amount to creating a thought crime. Bencher Joanne St. Lewis and a number of others took issue with a recommendation that the law society will pro- vide firms of at least 25 licensees with data concerning the demographic makeup of their employees from information gathered in annual reports. St. Lewis said this recommendation could be harmful for lawyers who do not want their confidential information submitted to their firm and that firms could easily identify those the information came from. "The reality of firms over 25 is that there is not sufficient critical mass in just about any firm I can think of to provide that level of cover for people," she said. "Those individuals should not be forced into a position where you are returning the information to their employer if they chose not to tell them," she added. She later introduced a successful amendment, which changed the recommendation so that it would be "consistent with the best practices established to protect licensees vul- nerable to harm" that could come from the disclosure. Despite some benchers' opposition to some of the recom- mendations, members of the working group said it was vital for them to be voted on an omnibus basis because they were designed to work together. Troister's motion failed in a 31-19 vote with two abstentions. — ALEX ROBINSON LSUC APPROVES RECOMMENDATIONS TO BATTLE SYSTEMIC RACISM Order # 804218-65203 $488 2 volume looseleaf supplemented book Anticipated upkeep cost – $405 per supplement 4-6 supplements per year Supplements invoiced separately 0-88804-218-3 Shipping and handling are extra. Price(s) subject to change without notice and subject to applicable taxes. Canadian Employment Law Stacey Reginald Ball More than 7,000 cases cited Canadian Employment Law is a one-stop reference that provides a thorough survey of the law and analysis of developing trends, suggesting potential avenues of attack as well as identifying potential weaknesses in the law. Canadian Employment Law has been cited by the Supreme Court of Canada, in superior courts in every province in Canada, and is used in law schools throughout Canada. Available risk-free for 30 days Order online: www.carswell.com Call Toll-Free: 1-800-387-5164 In Toronto: 416-609-3800 Also available online on WestlawNext® Canada EmploymentSource™ © 2016 Thomson Reuters Canada Limited 00234UC-84746-CE

• Cover