Canadian Lawyer InHouse

July 2016

Legal news and trends for Canadian in-house counsel and c-suite executives

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/693804

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 10 of 43

11 CANADIANLAWYERMAG.COM/INHOUSE JULY 2016 By Cynthia Rowden Intellectual Property T he Economist recently commented on the low level of Canadian patent activity, with Canada behind not only perennial patent powerhouses South Korea and Japan but also most other developed regions, accord- ing to the article "More Particle Than Wave" in the April issue of the magazine. Figures from the Canadian government and the World Intellectual Property Organization show the same applies to trademarks: • Canadian trademark fi lings have remained relatively fl at since 2008. • Canadians fi le fewer Canadian trademark applica- tions than non-Canadians. • Canadians fi le fewer applications abroad. Canada's industries are regularly described as resource-focused, but nationals in resource-rich coun- tries of comparable size such as Australia fi le at higher rates than Canadians. An amazing 99 per cent of all Canadian businesses are small and medium enterprises, according to "Key Small Business Statistics" released in 2013 from Industry Canada. Competition can be tough, and resources for intellectual property, includ- ing trademarks, can be limited. Yet Canadian trade- mark fi ling costs are currently among the lowest in the world ($250 for all goods/services). Trademarks and trade are how customers locate and remember businesses, and it is important to set aside resources to ensure innovation costs are not wasted by failure to register in Canada and abroad. In Canada, the benefi ts of registration include: • Exclusive right to use the mark throughout Canada for the registered goods/services, and to sue for Can- ada-wide injunctions; • Notice of trademark status, ownership, and the goods/services of interest. Business and brand name clearance strategies normally involve a search of the Register of Trademarks, providing notice of prior rights, and hopefully deterrence against adoption and use of a confusing name/mark; • The Trademarks Offi ce examines for prior rights, and may refuse other applications without the origi- nal registrant having to do anything; • Registrants can record their marks with Customs au- thorities to prevent counterfeits; and • Registrations are identifi able business assets. In most European and Asian countries, trademark rights are totally dependent upon registration. Wait- ing to fi le can mean lost rights or expensive and uncer- tain procedures to regain rights. Early registration may also help to avoid trademark "trolls" who register with the goal of extorting the original brand owner. Prior third-party registrations can put not only the Canadian business at risk of being sued for infringement but also local partners such as contractors, retail customers, exporters, importers, and licensees. Without registra- tion, businesses may be unable to stop unauthorized or counterfeit activities or prevent registration of a confusing trademark. After Canada, businesses should consider both where they intend to sell and where their competition will come from: • Plan three to fi ve years out so trademarks are fi led/ registered before sales start; • For many, the most important markets will be the United States and Europe. The European trademark system offers coverage in dozens of EU countries with one fi ling; • Identify countries known as exporters of similar products, or cheap knockoffs, where stopping in- fringement may require registration; and • Prioritize foreign markets based on projected sales and competitive risks. The business may infl uence where protection is sought — the focus for a high- tech company may be different for clothing, agri- goods, or pharmaceuticals. International registration costs may seem high (fi l- ing fees of $3,000 or more). Timing of expenditures can be managed by staggering fi lings to take advantage of treaty provisions that deem foreign fi lings to be made on the Canadian fi ling date. Canada is also expected to become a member of an international fi ling system (the Madrid Protocol), bringing further cost savings (and likely a lot more fi lings from abroad into Canada). Higher trademark fi ling rates by our global trading partners suggest they recognize the benefi ts of national and international trademark protection — such as ex- clusive rights, easier enforcement, access to Customs protection, deemed validity, and notice to others, plus less tangible benefi ts such as deterrence, simplifi ed licensing, and the peace of mind that comes with the certainty of rights and remedies. IH Cynthia Rowden is partner and head of trademarks at Bereskin & Parr LLP. Now's the time to develop a global trademark strategy The rest of the world is taking advantage of registration systems and Canadians should, too.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer InHouse - July 2016