Canadian Lawyer InHouse

July 2016

Legal news and trends for Canadian in-house counsel and c-suite executives

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/693804

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 19 of 43

JULY 2016 20 INHOUSE that I'm required to do or that will be useful I think that's preferable. What works for me is less formality; so if fi rms feel that they can help me, let's do away with the meet-and- greet and just focus on the content. I fi nd that much more valuable. THOUIN: We have a process for a more for- mal retention of legal services for a larger project, but there are situations where it's a very specialized area of law and then you have to go out and fi nd the right approach. I think the more successful law fi rms, at least the ones we deal with, always offer some- thing else, whether it's education sessions or project management. I think there's an ex- pectation, at least among the colleagues that I know, that there's something else their law fi rm adds to the value that they give. • INHOUSE: What kind of experience have you had with requests for proposal? SPEIRS: I like something in between where you don't have all the cumbersome proce- dure that an RFP has, but you have some clear criteria of what you're looking for that's objective and measurable and that hits the right balancing act — that type of ap- proach suits my needs. Let's say we're look- ing for a law fi rm that will do all our human rights litigation, for instance. Whether it's It's a buyer's market g for legal services. The economy has changed, the industry, the legal profession has changed, and companies have changed. Given the economic climate in Canada, there's always this pressure on service providers to bring more to the table. ROBERT SOCCIO, Navistar Canada Are you just a cost centre or can you be part of the strategic growth of the industry and the company? LARA SPEIRS, Randstad Canada

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer InHouse - July 2016