Canadian Lawyer InHouse

March 2016

Legal news and trends for Canadian in-house counsel and c-suite executives

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/644628

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 27 of 39

MARCH 2016 28 INHOUSE ONTARIO REPORT is helping with. Davis has been at McMaster eight years and there are three lawyers in the depart- ment that was formalized in June 2014. Much of what they do is focused on what the health science and other faculties do and around a lot of the entrepreneurship funding from the province. "There is lots of work there about trying to maximize the return to the community on some of the in- vestments they make on the research side to make sure the intellectual property created in the university does make its way back out to help the wider society," he says. Figuring out how best to source exter- nal legal services continues to challenge in-house counsel, but many, like Davis, are turning to their procurement departments to help with the process and narrow the ros- ter while at the same time keeping a balance between big law and local providers. When Davis created the offi ce of legal services, he went through a procurement process with help from procurement services at McMaster. "We created a request for proposal and had 33 law fi rms that responded," he says. "We had the grading criteria, and eventually through a robust process, narrowed it down to fi ve. So we have fi ve external law fi rms that have their own area of specialty that provide services to us. We wanted a mix of large and small and we wanted representation from the local fi rms. Out of the 33, we had seven Hamilton law fi rms that bid on work. We defi nitely wanted a mix — we have a large Toronto fi rm, a local Hamilton fi rm." Davis says all of the fi rms that bid were "creative and fl exible" in offering a variety of different alternative-fee models — some- thing he asked for in the RFP. "Some things are going to be open-ended and they won't be able to give us fi rm quotes, while some work they might see over and over again they should be able to give us a fi rm quote on and a range. That's worked pretty well — it gives us more of an insight into fore- casting what legal services might be for a particular matter." IH We created a request for proposal and had 33 law fi rms that responded. BRENT DAVIS McMaster University '' ''

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer InHouse - March 2016