Canadian Lawyer

w w w . C A N A D I A N L a w y e r m a g . c o m F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 6 19 have found our "good-enough" info-management coping mechanisms to get us through each day, and we have made our peace with this new world order. But it strikes me that none of this is particularly sustain- able. Think of those three (relatively simple) information retrieval requests: a client address, your meeting notes, and the most up-to-date version of the main agreement being negotiated for that client. How many of us have this con- nected information in one place and can say that it would take seconds to retrieve these resources? The issue is that our retrieval requests are getting more complex as firms develop more deeply client-centric worlds. By viewing our client's businesses, their industries, previous deals, and their strategic goals through a big (or big-ish) data prism, correlations and actionable patterns can emerge. From predictions as to how cases may fare in any given jurisdiction to determining the right price for a mandate, the opportunities for big data and business intelligence are just getting started (see DataFloq.com, TyMetrix LegalView Analytics, and Sky Analytics for companies driving such exploration). The ability to store client and matter data in meaningful and governable ways will be key to extracting future knowledge for higher-value purposes. Our personal and haphazard information organization skills will be completely unscalable in such a client-centric world, with diverse teams needing to know where the latest informa- tion is or who might have it. In a physical, paper world, it was tracking the single document down one office and one desk at a time. Shared organizational values within the team increased your chances of finding that resource quickly and painlessly (such as making it someone's responsibility to keep the matter file up to date and all in one place). Today, most of us know the inordinate amount of time we spend chasing down virtual versions of the information we need. Multiply these lost hours by the number of people on the project team and suddenly the need to find a solution to all this findability pain becomes paramount. For a time, that solution was to centralize everything: a centralized contacts database, a document management sys- tem (organized e-mails and documents by client and matter folders), and a time management and billing system. But other information bits do not obey such centralization edicts. So uniquely personal are they that any attempt to centralize comes unstuck when applied to our unique productivity tools, our note-taking apps, and our e-mail inboxes. Then enterprise search came along and told us it had the solution — no need to know where all those bits of informa- tion are stored, the golden search box was all you needed . . . unless, of course, the information bits you need aren't indexed by the search engine or get obliterated by the other rubbish that is being indexed. Even now, some of the best practices coming from regula- tors and technology consultants are pointing to more cen- tralization — a "single, accurate, and aggregated view of the customer" that can be tracked throughout the lifetime of that customer as details, investment goals, and needs change — a way to link a client address to the deals and cases they have on the go, to the communications, and often sensitive data, that is shared during those interactions. Developing our capabilities in sharing this core information with our teams in ways that perhaps mimic the old paper client and matter files could reduce the hours of fruitless searching we experience each week. Perhaps we need to look at the increasing regulatory and security burdens as an opportunity to improve our data capa- bilities. Perhaps as we work to meet our obligations on that front, we can also look to solve the different retrieval needs for client and matter information, and at each of the different levels: personal, team, and firm. It seems to me that all this is connected — bringing togeth- er client and matter data to respond to know-your-client and cybersecurity requests and the lawyer's need for fewer places to look for essential client/matter information. What's needed though is a robust data and information architecture that can operate as a unified platform to deal with the growing data management regulations — but one that can also deliver solu- tions to both the personal and firm-wide information chaos we continue to find ourselves in. Kate Simpson is national director of knowledge management at Bennett Jones LLP, and is responsible for developing the firm's KM strategy and initiatives. The opinions expressed in this article are her own. Order # 804218-65203 $460 2 volume looseleaf supplemented book Anticipated upkeep cost – $333 per supplement 4-6 supplements per year Supplements invoiced separately 0-88804-218-3 Shipping and handling are extra. Price(s) subject to change without notice and subject to applicable taxes. 00227VI-A48890 Canadian Employment Law Stacey Reginald Ball More than 6,145 cases cited Canadian Employment Law is a one-stop reference that provides a thorough survey of employment law and analysis of developing trends, suggesting potential avenues of attack as well as identifying potential weaknesses in the law. Canadian Employment Law has been cited by the Supreme Court of Canada, in superior courts in every province in Canada, and is used in law schools throughout Canada. CANADA LAW BOOK ® Available risk-free for 30 days Order online: www.carswell.com Call Toll-Free: 1-800-387-5164 In Toronto: 416-609-3800 Also available online on WestlawNext® Canada EmploymentSource™

• Cover