Canadian Lawyer

w w w . C A N A D I A N L a w y e r m a g . c o m A p r i l 2 0 1 4 3 by gail j. cohen Editor's dEsk Support and encourage — don't make it mandatory Director/Group Publisher: Karen Lorimer karen.lorimer@thomsonreuters.com Editor in Chief: Gail J. Cohen gail.cohen@thomsonreuters.com Staff Writer: Charlotte Santry charlotte.santry@thomsonreuters.com Copy Editor: Mallory Hendry Art Director: Bill Hunter Production Co-ordinator: Catherine Giles catherine.giles@thomsonreuters.com Contributors: Jean Sorensen, donalee Moulton, Geoff Ellwand, Marg. Bruineman, Yamri Taddese, Richard Foot, Jennifer Brown, Ron Stang, Ian Harvey Canadian Lawyer is published 11 times a year by Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents may not be reprinted without written permission. The opinions expressed in articles are not necessarily those of the publisher. Information presented is compiled from sources believed to be accurate, however, the publisher assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. Canadian Lawyer disclaims any warranty as to the accuracy, completeness or currency of the contents of this publication and disclaims all liability in respect of the results of any action taken or not taken in reliance upon information in this publication. Advertising Sales Representatives Legal Suppliers: Kimberlee Pascoe Tel: (416) 649-8875 E-mail: kimberlee.pascoe@thomsonreuters.com Law Firms: Joseph Galea Tel: (416) 649-9919 E-mail: joseph.galea@thomsonreuters.com Law Firms: Grace So Tel: (416) 609-5838 E-mail: grace.so@thomsonreuters.com Law Firms: Steffanie Munroe Tel: 416-298-5077 E-mail: steffanie.munroe@thomsonreuters.com Canadian Lawyer Magazine Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Tel: (416) 298-5141 Fax: (416) 649-7870 E-mail: clb.cleditor@thomsonreuters.com Web: www.canadianlawyermag.com Linkedin: linkd.in/179bx8t Twitter: @canlawmag Publications Mail Agreement #40766500 ISSN 0703-2129 Copyright © 2014 HST Registration #R121349799 RETURN UNDELIVERABLE CANADIAN ADDRESS TO: CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT ONE CORPORATE PLAzA 2075 KENNEDY RD., TORONTO, ON. M1T 3V4 RETOURNER TOUTE CORRESPONDANCE NE POUVANT ÊTRE LIVRÉE AU CANADA AU SERVICE DES PUBLICATIONS ONE CORPORATE PLAzA, 2075 KENNEDY RD., TORONTO, ON. M1T 3V4 Circulation/Address Changes/Subscriptions Keith Fulford: Tel: (416) 649-9585 Fax: (416) 649-7870 E-mail: keith.fulford@thomsonreuters.com Subscription rates: Canada1 year print and digital $75 plus HST, 1 year digital only $55. Outside Canada 1 year print & digital $95, 1 year digital only $55. Student rate 1 year print and digital $38 plus HST, 1 year digital only $20 plus HST. For all circulation inquiries and address changes send a copy of your mailing label or labels along with your request in writing to Canadian Lawyer , One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Indexed in the Canadian Periodical Index I t was a tough choice not to write about the Supreme Court of Canada's decision denying Stephen Harper's appointment of Justice Marc Nadon to the top court. It has so many juicy elements: politics, Quebec's unique role, the Consti- tution, the quality of legal drafting, good and evil (well maybe not, but maybe yes). But others, and I mean practically every pundit in the country who knows how to spell Supreme Court of Canada, has had their say, so I'll move on. So let's talk about pro bono since we've dedicated a large part of this issue of Cana- dian Lawyer to it. It all started last year after a lunchtime chat with Pro Bono Students Canada's Nikki Gershbain who planted the idea of doing some kind of survey looking at the pro bono work Canadian lawyers are involved in. Apparently it had never been done before. Some months and a bit of research later, writer Charlotte Santry proposed two different surveys: one for law firms to examine how they treated pro bono activity (see the smashing chart on page 32) and the other asking individual lawyers about their pro bono experiences. While we didn't get every law firm in Canada to respond to the first survey, a respectable number came through and shared their information. It's notoriously difficult to get law firms here to open up, so I applaud the firms that made the effort and shared statistics on the number of tracked pro bono hours their associates and partners do as well as how the firm treats its pro bono activities. Hopefully seeing what others are doing will inspire firms to look at what they're doing and, down the road, share that information when we poll the profession again. As expected, the debate over pro bono versus legal aid was a large part of the discussion resulting from the survey of lawyers. But as one respondent pointed out, whether governments increase or decrease budgets for legal aid, there will always be areas of the law never covered leaving a hole in access to justice but also offer- ing opportunities for practitioners to get involved in their communities in new and different ways. More than half of the survey respondents said they feel they have a duty to provide pro bono legal services. Anecdotally — and this is from conver- sations I've had with lawyers over many, many years — pro bono work is often the most memorable part of what they do. That's true even if it's not marquee cases going to the Supreme Court but simply doing "garden-variety" quick hits for low- income people. I see a couple of trends in the profession that have taken hold over the last few years. The first is that law students are being brought in to the profession with a sense of social commitment to public interest and social justice work. Some law schools are making it mandatory for students to par- ticipate in such activities to graduate and others are helping to support and provide students with those opportunities. Simply, this means the next generation of lawyers already has the mindset of using their legal training for the greater good. The other trend is an increase in the number of public sector and in-house counsel who are doing pro bono (see page 35). Individual lawyers are finding ways of using their skills to help non-profit groups or stepping out into different prac- tice areas to work in local legal clinics. As well, the Canadian Corporate Counsel Association has recently formed a pro bono committee that will be looking at issues such as insurance requirements for in- house lawyers who want to do pro bono. Federal Crown attorneys, who have been hamstrung from doing volunteer legal work, now are also able to participate in three pilot projects that will allow them to volunteer for approved activities (screened by the Department of Justice to minimize conflicts) at legal clinics in Vancouver, Edmonton, and Ottawa. There is a lot of enthusiasm in the pro- fession to do pro bono and those who are keen should be supported and encouraged by their firms and colleagues. But as the overwhelming results of our survey show: law societies should never make pro bono mandatory.

• Cover