Canadian Lawyer InHouse

Feb/Mar 2014

Legal news and trends for Canadian in-house counsel and c-suite executives

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/245653

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 29 of 47

BLOWI THE WH ON FR CNR discovers financial incentives have prompted disgruntled employees south of the border to cash in on legislation. by Jim Middlemiss 30 February 2014 INHOUSE C anadian corporations need to embrace whistleblowers if they operate or trade in the U.S., where a new bounty system and greater protections have created a favorable environment for whistleblowing, legal experts say. "U.S. employees are aware of the legislation and are taking advantage of it," says Andrew Gray, a litigator at Torys LLP in Toronto. The attention paid by Canadian businesses to whistleblowing intensified last year when Canadian National Railway Co. became one of the first Canadian companies to be sued under whistleblower protections set out in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Timothy Wallender, a trainmaster at the CNR's Harrison Yard in Memphis, Tenn., sued his former employer claiming he was fired after raising concerns that the company's dwell time statistics were false. The complaint, filed in the Western Dis- trict of Tennessee, alleges a key measurement of a railway's efficiency is the length of time railcars spend in a terminal before being sent out in a newly assembled train, known as "terminal dwell time" — the longer the dwell time, the less efficient the operation. The complaint alleges "favorable statistics on terminal dwell at Harrison Yard are based on persistent and pervasive fraud," which CNR denies. The complaint argues "statistics about a railroad's dwell time are material to shareholders and prospective shareholders when deciding whether to buy, hold or sell the railroad's shares." Wallender claims supervisor Andrew Martin ordered employees to "falsely list trains as having departed from the Harrison Yard even though the trains had not left the yard" and told employees to change CNR computers to show trains left the yard 30 minutes earlier than they did. Wallender

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer InHouse - Feb/Mar 2014