Canadian Lawyer

October 2024

The most widely read magazine for Canadian lawyers

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/1527910

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 18 of 59

bargaining unit work during a legal strike or lockout: 1. Any employee, manager, or person employed in a confidential capacity in matters related to industrial rela- tions, hired after notice to bargain was given 2. Any contractor (other than a depen- dant contractor) or any employee of another employer (i.e., a traditional replacement worker) 3. Any employee whose normal workplace is one other than where the strike or lockout is taking place, who was trans- ferred to the location at which the strike or lockout is taking place after the notice to bargain was given 4. Any employee in the bargaining unit (except for maintenance of activities in compliance with section 87.4 or 87.7 of the CLC) 5. Any volunteer, student, or member of the public There are two exceptions to these prohibitions: 1. If an employer utilized the services of any contractor or employee of another employer to perform bargaining unit work before notice to bargain was given, it can continue to use those workers during a strike or lockout, but only in the same manner, to the same extent, and in the same circumstances as they were used before notice to bargain was given 2. To address an imminent and serious threat to life, health or safety, destruction of property, or environmental damage and there are no other means to deal with the situation The penalty to a business for a breach is a fine of up to $100,000 per day. Note: An employer may use non- bargaining unit employees or managers to perform bargaining unit work if they were employed at the workplace prior to the date on which notice to bargain was given. Expedite the process for maintenance of activities agreements Maintenance of activities applies when the cessation of work during a strike or lockout would result in a threat to the safety or health of the public that would be immediate or serious. Bill C-58 expedites the process to determine maintenance of activities and removes certain notice requirements. Under Bill C-58, as of June 20, 2025, the parties must come to an agreement on maintenance of activities within 15 days from the notice to bargain. If an agreement is reached, it must be immediately filed with the minister of labour and the Canadian Industrial Relations Board (CIRB). If the parties agree no activities must be maintained, that agreement must also be filed with the minister of labour and the CIRB. If no agreement is reached, either party may apply to the CIRB for a determination on maintenance of activities issues. The CIRB must issue a decision within 82 days of that application. An expedited process may not favour either side to a labour dispute. However, the CIRB has set the bar so high it has been almost impossible for any party to prove a threat to the safety or health of the public that would be immediate or serious. An example is the recent work stoppage at CP Rail and CN Rail and the referral to the CIRB brought by the minister of labour. Despite receiving written submissions from 54 affected groups and organizations, many opposed to the work stoppage, the CIRB determined there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate an immediate or serious threat to safety or health. 5 As a result, the CIRB ruled that if the parties were in a legal work stoppage position, they did not have to maintain activities. How can a business prepare for Bill C-58? As noted above, Bill C-58 has the potential to result in more frequent and prolonged strikes among federally regulated busi- nesses and to impact a broad range of other businesses, indirectly. For a federally regulated business, there is no question Bill C-58's limit on replacement workers will make contingency planning more difficult. However, there are several options that should be explored. For example, before notice to bargain is given, a business could hire additional employees and/or intermingle into the target workplace managers and non-union employees who may work elsewhere in the organization. This requires careful planning and coordination, which cannot happen overnight. A provincially regulated business assessing its risks should consider the following factors (as a starting point): • Is a federally regulated business a key part of the supply chain? • Is a federally regulated business located at or near the worksite? • What is the extent of unionization at the federally regulated business? • What is the likely impact of a work stop- page on the provincially regulated business? • What contingency planning (operational and otherwise) can be put into place – hiring, training, redundancies, other locations, etc.? • How quickly can contingency planning ramp up when needed? For how long? At what cost? There are a multitude of factors to consider, and reconsider, which is why contingency planning can take several months to develop and operationalize. The time to prepare is now. Sherrard Kuzz LLP has extensive experience assisting clients to design and operationalize strike contingency plans at the federal and provincial levels. To learn more and for assistance, contact Sundeep A. Gokhale at sgokhale@sherrardkuzz.com or 416-603-6246 or any member of our team at info@sherrardkuzz.com. www.canadianlawyermag.com 17 1 Employment and Social Development Canada, "Work stoppages by sector and year" (June 30, 2024), online: Government of Canada https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/services/collective-bar- gaining-data/work-stoppages/work-stoppages-year-sector.html. 2 RSC 1985, c L-2. 3 This can occur at any time within the four months immediately preceding the expiry of the collective agreement or such longer period as provided in the collective agreement. 4 J.A. Sgro, chair of the Standing Committee on International Trade, "The Strike in 2023 at British Columbia Ports: Selected Economic Impacts and Federal Actions" (April 2024), online: House of Commons 44th Parl, 1st Sess https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/441/CIIT/Reports/RP13042199/ciitrp18/ciitrp18-e.pdf. 5 Canadian Pacific Kansas City Railway v. Teamsters Canada Rail Conference, 2024 CIRB 1153.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer - October 2024