Canadian Lawyer

March 2020

The most widely read magazine for Canadian lawyers

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/1213869

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 23 of 59

Determining children's consent for treatment Family law lawyers say there's still tremendous uncertainty despite Court of Appeal decision A RECENT CASE highlights how the Health Care Consent Act, which calls for judges to take a child's wishes into account when it comes to consenting to treatment, is not the ultimate consideration in family law cases where the court is considering reunifi- cation therapy in child alienation cases. In A.M. v. C.H., which dealt with a 14-year- old child who had been estranged from his father by his mother, the Ontario Court of Ap- peal ruled that overlaid on the HCCA is the Divorce Act and the Children's Law Reform Act in Ontario, "which say the best interest of the child are the ultimate test for the court," says Laurie Pawlitza, a partner in the family law group at Torkin Manes LLP. "In particular, it's spelled out in the Chil- dren's Law Reform Act that, while a court is FEATURE FOCUS ON FAMILY LAW 22 www.lawtimesnews.com

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer - March 2020