Canadian Lawyer

March 2013

The most widely read magazine for Canadian lawyers

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/111666

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 38 of 47

LEGAL REPORT/Family Law Separation of church and state The enforceability and status of Islamic marriage contracts in Ontario, and the rest of Canada, is still in flux. by Elizabeth Raymer on divorce. ���What you have is a textbook case of legal pluralism,��� says Anver Emon, an associate professor in the University of Toronto���s Faculty of Law, whose research focus includes premodern and modern Islamic legal history and theory. ���We���re try- ing to fit two puzzles together into a master puzzle,��� says Emon, who provided expert opinion in Yar. At issue is the notion of an Islamic marriage contract as ���religious,��� and therefore needing to conform to a www.CANADIAN L a w ye r m a g . c o m March 2013 39 Jacqui Oakley W hen two Iranian medical doctors married in a civil ceremony in London, England in 1991 ��� and again in an Islamic marriage ceremony in Berlin two years later ��� the wife had no reason to think the terms of her marriage contract would be questioned in Canada, where the couple later settled and then separated after 13 years. Yet that���s the position Roya Fatemeh Yar found herself in when her husband challenged her right to the ���mahr��� that is standard in the Islamic marriage contract: that is, the material provisions a bridegroom agrees to make for his bride upon marriage, sometimes translated as dower. In the Yars��� case, the mahr was valued at $741,643. At trial, the judge heard from two expert witnesses, both university professors but with vastly divergent opinions of what constituted a valid mahr and, in fact, a valid Islamic marriage. The judge accepted the opinion of one (the more conservative) expert, finding ���the Islamic marriage between the parties is void,��� and the amount claimed for the mahr was ���completely out of line and unreasonable.��� Last September the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered a new trial in Yar v. Yar, but the case underlines the confusion and difficulty Canadian courts have had dealing with Islamic marriage contracts, the terms of which are increasingly being contested

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer - March 2013