Canadian Lawyer InHouse

March/April 2019

Legal news and trends for Canadian in-house counsel and c-suite executives

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/1092163

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 16 of 43

17 CANADIANLAWYERMAG.COM/INHOUSE MARCH/APRIL 2019 lated to the environmental problems. As well, a dispute over the meaning of an agreement signed in 1985 between the prov- ince and two companies to end litigation stemming from the mercury poisoning and also to keep pulp and paper operations going at the Dryden plant is to be heard later this month by the Supreme Court of Canada. The issues to be resolved by the court in Resolute FP Canada Inc. et al v. Ontario could have implications in commercial con- tracts far beyond that of the scope of the 1985 indemnity. It is also another reminder about the importance of precision in con- tract drafting. "You have to be cautious to avoid boiler plate language," says Natalie Mullins, a partner at Gowling WLG in To- ronto. "You have to address every issue very specifi cally," adds Mullins, whose practice focuses on environmental-based litigation. sattva v. creston CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION In its 2014 decision in Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., the Supreme Court attempted to provide guidance for trial courts in the area of contractual interpretation and moved away from it being only a pure question of law. Instead, it outlined these factors for judges to consider. "The interpretation of contracts has evolved towards a practical, common-sense approach not dominated by technical rules of construction. The overriding concern is to determine the intent of the parties and the scope of their understanding… To do so, a decision-maker must read the contract as a whole, giving the words used their ordinary and grammatical meaning, consistent with the surrounding circumstances known to the parties at the time of formation of the contract. Consideration of the surrounding circumstances recognizes that ascertaining contractual intention can be diffi cult when looking at words on their own, because words alone do not have an immutable or absolute meaning…The goal of examining such evidence is to deepen a decision-maker's understanding of the mutual and objective intentions of the parties as expressed in the words of the contract.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer InHouse - March/April 2019