Canadian Lawyer InHouse

Feb/Mar 2013

Legal news and trends for Canadian in-house counsel and c-suite executives

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/103643

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 33 of 47

InDUsTRY spOTLIgHT KEEPING fraNCHISEES IN tHE LOOP The franchisor/franchisee relationship has always been a unique, and sometimes tricky, one to navigate. A strong communication plan just might be a franchisor's best defense. By Vanessa Chris If the Ontario Superior Court's Feb. 24 ruling of Fairview Donut Inc. v. The TDL Group Corp. taught us one thing, it's that good communication counts. In the class action, Tim Hortons' franchisees claimed it breached their franchise agreement and its duty of good faith and fair dealing by switching from fresh-baked goods to "Always Fresh" partially pre-baked goods. It also required them to introduce a lunch menu, which they claim increased their costs and forced them to sell the products at a loss. There have been many cases where the franchisees had a leg to stand on because the franchisor made major 34 • F eb r u a ry 2013 business decisions without a paper trail proving it considered the franchisees' interests. This wasn't one of those cases. It's clear that Tim Hortons' communication strategy is one other franchisors can learn from. "The franchisor engaged in extensive discussion and communication with its franchisees before the Always Fresh conversion and the change was supported by the majority of franchisees," Justice J. Strathy said in his summary judgement. "The franchisor informed the franchisees that the cost of raw materials would increase under Always Fresh, but that this would be offset by labour savings and other savings and conveniences. The experience INHOUSE of the franchisees over time has confirmed this assertion." Although the plaintiffs appealed Strathy's decision, the Court of Appeal upheld it in December, dismissing the appeal entirely. Until this case, franchise legislation — which has evolved over the past decade in Alberta, Ontario, Manitoba, New Brunswick, and PEI — has appeared to be fairly one-sided. After years of franchisors having the upper hand, the new legislation was partly designed to even the playing field. "Because the franchisor/franchisee relationship is such a close one, and it's one in which the franchisor exerts such strong control of all aspects of

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer InHouse - Feb/Mar 2013