Canadian Lawyer

October 2018

The most widely read magazine for Canadian lawyers

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/1033679

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 49 of 55

50 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 8 w w w . c a n a d i a n l a w y e r m a g . c o m A s the case of Bruce McArthur, the landscaper and suspected serial killer in Toronto, continues to hit the headlines, a team of forensic investigators has been kept busy collecting and analyzing evidence behind the scenes. Canada's only full-time forensic anthropologist, Kathy Gruspier, and her team have been taxed with examining the remains of eight victims, using techniques including dental and fingerprint analyses. The evidence they analyze may or may not help convict McArthur, who has been charged with the murders and held in segregation in Toronto since January. Dr. Gruspier is the forensic anthropologist in the Office of the Chief Coroner and Ontario Forensic Pathology Service and an advisory committee member of the Centre for Forensic Science and Medicine at the University of Toronto. She also holds a law degree, regularly testifies in criminal proceedings and testified before the Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario a decade ago. She, along with other experts interviewed by Canadian Lawyer, caution that although many new techniques have been developed and are being used in forensic evidence, some may have questionable bases in science. Indeed, even those based in hard science, such as DNA evi- dence, have produced wrongful convictions. "I don't think a lot [of forensic science] has been tested in the courts yet," says Grus- pier from her office at the Ontario Forensic Pathology Service laboratories in suburban Toronto. Much of it, such as pattern evidence, does not have a grounding in hard science, she notes, but has been developed by the criminal justice system for its own use. And, "the trier of fact is deciding on evidence but is not a scientist." The test hinges in the reliability of the technique used — in other words, its fallibil- ity. Stephen Goudge, formerly an Ontario appellate judge, was commissioner for the Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario in 2007-2008. The recommendations that he made in his final report included better training and qualifications for prac- titioners in the field of pediatric forensic pathology and paved the way for the creation of the Ontario Forensic Pathology Service, which now heads up all forensic pathology investigations in the province. Lawyers should challenge new forensic techniques that have significant limitations By Elizabeth Raymer FALLIBLE EVIDENCE F O R E N S I C & C R I M I N A L L E G A L R E P O R T WAYNE MILLS

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer - October 2018