Canadian Lawyer

August 2018

The most widely read magazine for Canadian lawyers

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/1010711

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 17 of 67

18 A U G U S T 2 0 1 8 w w w . C A N A D I A N L a w y e r m a g . c o m n real estate sales, the doctrine of caveat emptor rules. And although the onus is on the buyer to beware to ensure they know what it is they are buying, the risks for both the buyer and seller in a volatile market can be very real and some just want to get out of the deal. A flurry of residential real estate activity erupted in communities across the country last year, resulting in com- peting offers, bidding wars and often astronomical prices. Fearing home pric- es would continue to escalate, eventu- ally pricing them out of the market, many buyers jumped in, often presenting offers above asking and without conditions. At the same time, the Bank of Cana- da, concerned that household debt was reaching a crisis stage and threatening the country's overall economy, tightened up mortgage lending rules, imposing stress tests on borrowers. Consumers were also facing higher mortgage rates from lenders. That all meant that Canadians couldn't borrow as much as they would have been able to borrow just a few months earlier. "We were getting calls from people who were either looking to get out of their agreements of purchase and sale or sellers who were asking about their rights and terms of enforcing them," says Gregory Sidlofsky, a certified specialist in civil litigation with Wagner Sidlofsky LLP in Toronto. Buyers knew the risks they were taking by waiving conditions on their offers, he says, but that presented a problem for some when it came time to confirm financing. Some buyers saw the market soften after they presented their offers to purchase but before they sold their own house. For others, the new stress test rules had come into play at the closing date, meaning they couldn't qualify for as large a mortgage as they would have had earlier. For some, it ended up in disas- ter. In Toronto, a couple fearing they would lose out on their dream house that was listed at $2 million offered $2.25 million only to realize they had overextended their ability to finance the home. At the end of the day, not being able to close cost the Hu family $500,000, leaving them with absolutely nothing to show for it. In Gamoff v. Hu, the would-be purchasers lost their R E A L E S TAT E By Marg. Bruineman ALEXI VELLA Backing out of a deal Purchasers may regret making an offer on a house, but reneging can be costly I

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer - August 2018