Canadian Lawyer

w w w . c a n a d i a n l a w y e r m a g . c o m J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 9 3 I n this issue, we look at how the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is under assault. Most recently, the premieres of Ontario and Quebec have threatened to invoke the notwithstanding clause to override Charter-based decisions. Many in the legal community are deeply troubled by this threat. While not every lawyer in Canada necessarily thinks the Charter is a force for good overall, I would venture to guess that a large majority do. As we conveyed on our cover, many lawyers feel that when politicians such as Ontario Premier Doug Ford and Quebec Premier Francois Legault invoke the notwithstanding clause, they are bringing a political axe to something that should be above politics. What defenders of the Charter should acknowledge, though, is that political consider- ations have always been relevant. Our cover story (p.28) takes us back to the early days of the Charter and why the notwithstanding clause was included. "What the premiers and prime minister agreed to is a safety valve," said then-justice minister Jean Chrétien at the time, "which is unlikely ever to be used except in non-controversial circumstances." Clearly, things have not unfolded quite as Chrétien predicted. Both Ford and Legault have threatened to use the notwithstanding clause in "controversial circumstances." And they have the legal authority to do so. But should they? Like all the political debates, public opinion will play a key role in deciding. As Shan- non Kari outlines in his story, the Charter is relatively young, and it doesn't have the long history that documents such as the U.S. Bill of Rights do. "The Charter is still in its infancy," criminal defence lawyer Dino Bottos told Kari. "We are now in only the second generation of people who have grown up with it as part of their daily lives." Defenders of the Charter, therefore, need to continue to educate Canadians about its value. And this does not just mean formal education in our classrooms, but also taking on cases that resonate with Canadians, whether these are about minority rights, such as same- sex marriage, or economic rights, such as the right to strike. And perhaps the most difficult area in which to justify the Charter's importance to everyday Canadians is criminal law. "Charter: Criminal's friend: Mountie," blared a head- line from the Canadian Press in 1981 as the Charter was set to be law. This law-and-order line of attack is still being used against the Charter today. Again, the response to this requires proponents to fight in the court of public opinion. More transparency in our criminal courts, whether it be through cameras in the courts or other means of educating the public in real time, is a way to do that. So, yes, the Charter is under attack. And politicians may be "breaking the glass" in what most would agree is not an emergency. But defenders of the Charter should keep in mind that even if the glass is broken, the words underneath are still there. And it is the Canadian public that will be called on to decide if the words still matter. E D I T O R ' S D E S K BREAKING THE CHARTER'S GLASS By Tim Wilbur Director/Group Publisher: Karen Lorimer karen.lorimer@tr.com Managing Editor: Tim Wilbur tim.wilbur@tr.com Acting Associate Editor: Aidan Macnab aidan.macnab@tr.com Copy Editor: Patricia Cancilla Art Director: Bill Hunter Production Co-ordinator: Catherine Giles catherine.giles@tr.com Contributors: Shannon Kari, Jean Sorensen, donalee Moulton, Mark Cardwell, Geoff Ellwand, Marg. Bruineman, Elizabeth Raymer, Anita Balakrishnan, Luis Millán Canadian Lawyer is published 10 times a year by Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents may not be reprinted without written permission. The opinions expressed in articles are not necessarily those of the publisher. Information presented is compiled from sources believed to be accurate, however, the publisher assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. Canadian Lawyer disclaims any warranty as to the accuracy, completeness or currency of the contents of this publication and disclaims all liability in respect of the results of any action taken or not taken in reliance upon information in this publication. Sales and Business Development Sales Manager: Paul Burton E-mail: paul.burton@tr.com Tel: 416-649-9928 Consultant, Strategy and Business Development: Ivan Ivanovitch E-mail: ivan.ivanovitch@tr.com Tel: 416-887-4300 Business Development Consultant: Kimberlee Pascoe E-mail: kimberlee.pascoe@tr.com Tel: 416-996-1739 Account Executive: Steffanie Munroe E-mail: steffanie.munroe@tr.com Tel: 416-315-5879 Canadian Lawyer Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Tel: (416) 298-5141 Fax: (416) 649-7870 E-mail: cl.editor@tr.com Web: canadianlawyermag.com Linkedin: linkedin.com/groups/4917423 Twitter: @canlawmag Facebook: facebook.com/CanLawMag Publications Mail Agreement #40766500 ISSN 0703-2129 © 2019 HST Registration #R121349799 RETURN UNDELIVERABLE CANADIAN ADDRESS TO: CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT One Corporate Plaza 2075 Kennedy RD., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 RETOURNER TOUTE CORRESPONDANCE NE POUVANT ÊTRE LIVRÉE AU CANADA AU SERVICE DES PUBLICATIONS One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Circulation/Address Changes/ Subscriptions Keith Fulford Tel: (416) 649-9585 Fax: (416) 649-7870 E-mail: keith.fulford@tr.com Subscription rates: Canada1 year print and digital $99 plus HST, 1 year digital only $99. Outside Canada 1 year print & digital $99 USD, 1 year digital only $99. For all circulation inquiries and address changes send a copy of your mailing label or labels along with your request in writing to Canadian Lawyer, One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 @canlawmag tim.wilbur@tr.com Correction In our October issue's Forensic and Criminal Law report, "Fallible evidence," some comments about the scientific foundations of forensic science made by Kathy Gruspier were mistakenly attributed to Caitlin Pakosh. Canadian Lawyer apologizes for the error.

• Cover