Canadian Lawyer

August 2018

The most widely read magazine for Canadian lawyers

Issue link: https://digital.canadianlawyermag.com/i/1010711

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 2 of 67

w w w . C A N A D I A N L a w y e r m a g . c o m A U G U S T 2 0 1 8 3 E D I T O R ' S D E S K @canlawmag tim.wilbur@tr.com Director/Group Publisher: Karen Lorimer karen.lorimer@tr.com Managing Editor: Tim Wilbur tim.wilbur@tr.com Acting Associate Editor: Aidan Macnab aidan.macnab@tr.com Copy Editor: Patricia Cancilla Art Director: Bill Hunter Production Co-ordinator: Catherine Giles catherine.giles@tr.com Contributors: Anita Balakrishnan, Jean Sorensen, donalee Moulton, Mark Cardwell, Geoff Ellwand, Marg. Bruineman, Elizabeth Raymer, Michael McKiernan, Alexia Kapralos, H.G. Watson Canadian Lawyer is published 10 times a year by Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents may not be reprinted without written permission. The opinions expressed in articles are not necessarily those of the publisher. Information presented is compiled from sources believed to be accurate, however, the publisher assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. Canadian Lawyer disclaims any warranty as to the accuracy, completeness or currency of the contents of this publication and disclaims all liability in respect of the results of any action taken or not taken in reliance upon information in this publication. Sales and Business Development Sales Manager: Paul Burton E-mail: paul.burton@tr.com Tel: 416-649-9928 Consultant, Strategy and Business Development: Ivan Ivanovitch E-mail: ivan.ivanovitch@tr.com Tel: 416-887-4300 Business Development Consultant: Kimberlee Pascoe E-mail: kimberlee.pascoe@tr.com Tel: 416-996-1739 Account Executive: Steffanie Munroe E-mail: steffanie.munroe@tr.com Tel: 416-315-5879 Canadian Lawyer Thomson Reuters Canada Ltd. One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Tel: (416) 298-5141 Fax: (416) 649-7870 E-mail: cl.editor@tr.com Web: canadianlawyermag.com Linkedin: linkedin.com/groups/4917423 Twitter: @canlawmag Facebook: facebook.com/CanLawMag Publications Mail Agreement #40766500 ISSN 0703-2129 © 2018 HST Registration #R121349799 RETURN UNDELIVERABLE CANADIAN ADDRESS TO: CIRCULATION DEPARTMENT One Corporate Plaza 2075 Kennedy RD., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 RETOURNER TOUTE CORRESPONDANCE NE POUVANT ÊTRE LIVRÉE AU CANADA AU SERVICE DES PUBLICATIONS One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Circulation/Address Changes/ Subscriptions Keith Fulford Tel: (416) 649-9585 Fax: (416) 649-7870 E-mail: keith.fulford@tr.com Subscription rates: Canada1 year print and digital $102 plus HST, 1 year digital only $99. Outside Canada 1 year print & digital $99 USD, 1 year digital only $99. For all circulation inquiries and address changes send a copy of your mailing label or labels along with your request in writing to Canadian Lawyer, One Corporate Plaza, 2075 Kennedy Rd., Toronto, ON. M1T 3V4 Influence beyond partisanship By Tim Wilbur n this issue, we unveil the ninth annual Top 25 Most Influential Lawyers list (p. 24). As I read feedback from our voters, I was also closely following the news of the confirmation debates in the United States — where the merits of President Don- ald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh are being hotly debated. At press time, the confirmation hearing timeline was still up the air, but it is set to be a contentious and polarized debate. Kavanaugh's pros and cons are being framed as though he is a sports star — can he help his team win or lose this zero-sum game? The contrast with Canada, as exemplified by many of the winners on our list, was striking. We have winners from all areas of practice, including private firms and aca- demics, but the most votes came for those who wield the most influence: the lawyers in our judicial and legislative branches. And the votes they received from our readers was rarely about partisanship. Our most popular winner was Supreme Court Justice Rosalie Abella. While Abella does not shy away from political debates — her speech to a U.S. audience denouncing "narcissistic populism" or her warnings to an audience in Israel about diminishing the power of its Supreme Court were clearly political — her influence for our readers was overwhelmingly about her advancement of the law through her judgments. Thomas Cromwell, a former Supreme Court judge, was our top vote-getter in the "Changemaker" category. While his many accomplishments on the bench were no doubt top of mind for many voters, he has been actively working on access to justice and advocating for smart adoption of technology since his retirement in 2016. He speaks publicly about the many issues facing our justice system and how incremental, not revolutionary, solutions will be what really make a difference to people's lives. Yasir Naqvi, the former attorney general of Ontario, also understood the importance of incrementalism when he launched a plan to modernize Ontario's justice system with his Digital Justice Action Plan. While not as revolutionary as some techno-evangelists may have wanted, his initiatives are having a positive effect. Now that litigants can file civil claims online and the government can correspond with potential jurors by email and text, more small-scale initiatives should be taken up by Ontario's new government — despite its different political mandate — to keep the positive momentum. While Canadians can be proud that our legal system is not as partisan as that of our neighbour to the south, this comes with one big drawback — a lack of transparency. While the debate about Supreme Court judges in the U.S. is polarized, it is also in the public space. Canadians, on the other hand, rarely hear public debates about our justice system, which also means they know very little about how it works. That is why statements about the need for transparency at the Supreme Court of Canada couldn't come at a better time, voiced by Chief Justice Richard Wagner, who is also a winner on our Top 25 Most Influential list. While Wagner may discover that with transparency comes controversy, as it often does in the U.S., he will have the confidence of many of our readers, given their votes of support. Let's hope that he, like all of our winners, will continue to influence our justice system in a way that transcends partisanship and is about much more than a zero-sum game. I

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Canadian Lawyer - August 2018